Wednesday, March 29, 2017

How the Republicans Sold Your Privacy to Internet Providers

The only thing wrong with this article is that it blames the Republicans....They are to blame for everything you know, as if the Democrats had not gone down this road and sold us out over and over again to the ATTs, TeleComs, Comcasts, NBCs, and Googles of the world. And so it continues.



  .How the Republicans Sold Your Privacy to Internet Providers - The New York Times:
The bill not only gives cable companies and wireless providers free rein to do what they like with your browsing history, shopping habits, your location and other information gleaned from your online activity, but it would also prevent the Federal Communications Commission from ever again establishing similar consumer privacy protections.
The bill is an effort by the F.C.C.’s new Republican majority and congressional Republicans to overturn a simple but vitally important concept — namely that the information that goes over a network belongs to you as the consumer, not to the network hired to carry it. It’s an old idea: For decades, in both Republican and Democratic administrations, federal rules have protected the privacy of the information in a telephone call. In 2016, the F.C.C., which I led as chairman under President Barack Obama, extended those same protections to the Internet.

Well the very idea of it boils my blood.  "information that goes over a network belongs to you as the consumer, not to the network hired to carry it. It’s an old idea."  Indeed it is an old idea. It started with the founding of the country and the early postal service envisioned as a democratizing communications system -that would become the envy of the world. (And we were then not consumers then but citizens.) If you want to read up on it I very much recommend a book I have just finished, Prologue to a Farce: Communication and Democracy in America.  I warn you it is a sad sad book.

And then there is the much lauded democratizing potential of the Internet....Blah, blah, blah.  A very good idea, but just hasn't worked out that way in real life politics largely controlled by corporate plutocracy. Very recently there was  good piece in the Nation, basically an momentarily premature obituary on "Net Neutrality" .  Trumps new FCC chair who is an obvious hatchet man for the industry plans to kill his own agency.  Not a new idea.  The gist of the NYT piece is that congress took power away from the FCC so they can not regulate in our interest.  True enough but this is a big overstatement on the true nature of that agency since it's inception.

One article that predicted what was going to happen  Tom Wheeler: Trump, GOP Plan To 'Modernize' The FCC A 'Fraud'  in "Tech Dirt" goes very deep  on the political scuttlebutt side but it is full of great references  Like who are these companies and what do they mean by competition and modernization?
The end result of this "modernization"? Less oversight than ever for industry giants AT&T, Comcast, Verizon and Charter. Given these companies' growing size, long and undeniable track record of anti-competitive behavior and outright fraud, what could possibly go wrong?
.....and we wouldn't want to go to Net Neutrality's funeral and memorial with out a few word to say and maybe some facts. Read it.


'via Blog this'

Monday, March 13, 2017

How Post-Watergate Liberals Killed Their Populist Soul - The Atlantic

The headline kind of give away the idea that something in our thinking has been wrong for a long time but this is actually a long historical article about the rebirth of Neo Liberalism as a dominate policy framework in American goverment.  (to which I have never ascribed.)  I highly recommend a through reading in light of the current split in public debate over the question of whether the Democrats planted the seeds of their own demise at the hands of Donald Trump or if the left is just divided by by those who support the likes of Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders and felt awakened and empowered by Occupy and vindicated by the economic collapse of 2008.  It is a big question and deserves serious study especially in the context of hyper angsty threads in mainstream and social media.

How Post-Watergate Liberals Killed Their Populist Soul - The Atlantic:



'via Blog this'

Trump Couldn’t Buy Coverage Like This

One thing is certain.  We love to hate him, and we hate the possibility of what could happen with him at the helm, and we hate .....well I could go on but I will just agree with the author. For someone who hasn't accomplished much and doesn't seem to know much Trump Couldn’t Buy Coverage Like This | Ian Welsh:  I will add one thing.  I believe that the mainstream media is unhinged and this serves Trump very well as recent approval ratings  polls indicate.



​​Pence 47/35% +13
Trump 45/47 -2
GOP 37/48 -11
Media 37/50-13
Dem Party 36/ -16
Hillary 35/55 -20
Congress 26/52 -26
Now go cry in your beer. It is all broken down here....,,we are in a minority and we are losing more every day. If this seems unbelievable I maintain it is because we are living in a vacuum of our own new and opinion. Source: Suffolk University USA today poll


'via Blog this'

Friday, March 3, 2017

Who owns Occupy.com and why are they stumping for the DNC?

This this a pretty disturbing article.  I believe neoliberalism has been outed around the world. People understand that politicians like the Clintons and their corporate clients are impoverishing the planet and the 99%. Neoliberal parties nonetheless still dominate media as can be seen so clearly in Britain with opposition to Coburn and in the US with Bernie.  So how can an organization with this name conclude:
"The Republican Party owes the American people an apology. Unfortunately, so do too many progressives, leftists, and democratic socialists who spend too much time criticizing “the establishment,” fantasizing about third parties, and showing only lukewarm support for the Democratic Party. It is time to unapologetically demand a more egalitarian and just society. It is time to accept that the Democratic Party is the means to that end."

It is not only possible but likely that neoliberal so-called centrist democrats will win futuare elections.  As we all know so clearly now, elections are manufactured and do not represent the will of the people.  So what happens if they Clinton corporate war machine wins again?  I firmly believe that there are only two real choices in the world, right wing capitalist fascism and socialism.  In this big picture I fear that if neoliberalism wins another round, it will be very short lived and followed by the rise of a charismatic, smart and "honest" fascist leader.  This in turn may bring us a 50 year reign of terror.  Centrist democrats have not changed, the DNC has not changed, the media has not changed  I fear the worst.

The Republican Party Owes the American People an Apology, and So Do We | Occupy.com:



'via Blog this'

Thursday, March 2, 2017

Trump’s Net Neutrality-Hating FCC Chair Is Already Gutting Public-Interest Regulations

I share the concern with many of my techie friend the Net Neutrality is very important and we are losing it by pieces and now by lumps.  You should read up.

ajit pai wheeler

Trump’s Net Neutrality-Hating FCC Chair Is Already Gutting Public-Interest Regulations | The Nation:
Within days of assuming the presidency, Trump named Ajit Pai as his FCC chair. A former associate general counsel for the Verizon telecommunications conglomerate, Pai was one of the FCC’s five commissioners during the Obama era. In that role, he often dissented against consumer-friendly regulations, robust market competition, and diversification of media ownership. Now, as FCC chair, Pai has moved rapidly to undo Obama’s FCC legacy, reversing or weakening measures that had begun to restore the commission’s commitment to regulating on behalf of the public, rather than the corporate, interest.



'via Blog this'

Wednesday, March 1, 2017

Cashing in: The Role of Politicians in an Oligarchy

Obama starts to cash in.  It to years for Bill and Hillary to get to 100 million
Image result for obama
Barack and Michelle Obama have sold the rights to their next books to Penguin Random House for a sum that has reportedly passed $60 million, according to a report by the Financial Times. (They will be writing separate books, but the rights were sold jointly.) As far as past and present presidential book deals go, this one’s a biggie: it surpasses previous records set by George W. Bush’s reported $7 million deal and Bill Clinton’s reported $15 million dollar advance.
Obama starts to cash in ... Ian Welsh:
The Role of Politicians in an Oligarchy… | Ian Welsh:



'via Blog this'